Home Page
Click Here
LEGAL NEWS

Federal appeal court judge to take senior status

U.S. Court of Appeals judge Terence T. Evans will seek senior status as of January 7, 2010.

His letter to President Barack Obama stated that he was choosing the January date to “bookend” his 34 years an “active” judge, including 30 years on the federal bench.

Evans, 69, began his judicial career as a circuit court judge in Milwaukee. He was appointed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in 1980 by President Jimmy Carter. President Bill Clinton appointed him to the 7th Circuit in 1995.

Evans, one of two federal appellate judges who work out of the Milwaukee office, doesn’t expect “senior status” to change his work life.

“I pretty much plan to keep working as I do now, but wanted more flexibility on time and when I do my cases,” he said.

He said he plans to still take cases in the 7th Circuit, but also hopes to do some work in the 9th Circuit to be closer to family who live in Seattle and San Francisco.

Evans also expects to hear district court cases in Milwaukee and Chicago.

Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Richard J. Sankovitz, who clerked for Evans, plans to put his name in for the seat, and expects an “interesting” crop of candidates, which could include U.S. District Court Judge Charles N. Clevert, Jr., appellate court judge Kitty K. Brennan and former state Supreme Court Justice Louis B. Butler.

Once President Obama nominates a candidate, the name is forwarded to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee for approval and then to the full Senate.

Sankovitz did not venture a guess as to how fast the process will go.

In March, Obama nominated Indiana Judge David Hamilton to fulfill another vacancy on the 7th Circuit. He is still awaiting confirmation by the full Senate.

2 Comments on This Article

1
The comments were not censored. They were posted on an earlier version of the story. When we updated the story after talking with Judge Evans, the second version did not retain the outside comments. The earlier story and comments can be found at http://www.wislawjournal.com/article.cfm?recID=74065.
Comment By  Tony Anderson
Monday, August 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM
2
What happened to the comments calling for a no-judicial appointment? Censorship thy name is the WLJ.......bye bye!
Comment By  Halley
Saturday, August 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Leave A Comment




Please type in the text from the above image:

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets".

ABOUT US     MANAGE MY ACCOUNT     SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT     PRIVACY POLICY     SUBSCRIBE     ADVERTISE     CONTACT US