|
Litigants leery of appellate court e-filing
The new rule requiring electronic filing of appellate briefs is now in effect, and practitioners are feeling their way through the process with some trepidation.
Some appellate attorneys have experience in federal court, where e-filing is mandated, and they say the state system offers little benefit to litigants.
“It’s progress for the court, but not an aid to the litigants,” said Marla J. Stephens, an attorney in the State Public Defender’s Office Appellate Division. “That’s not an opinion. It’s simply a factual statement.”
The new process will allow judges to freely access appellate briefs, no-merit reports, petitions for review and responses from the comfort of their own homes.
But Stephens, who has not yet filed an online brief, said that the process puts an additional burden on attorneys and staff because they must make an electronic filing, as well as a paper filing with the court.
Bumpy Process
The state Supreme Court adopted the rule last October and it took effect on July 1.
Attorneys Erin M. Patterson and Raymond M. Dall’Osto of Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown in Milwaukee e-filed one of the first appellate briefs on July 2.
Patterson said the process was “bumpy” compared to the federal filing system, largely because you must have a password, username, PIN number and document access verification code to be able to enter information.
“I honestly don’t like it as well,” she said.
The federal system requires only a password and username.
Patterson noted the process could prove intimidating for attorneys unfamiliar with e-filing. She said that a four-step process just to gain access may be a lot to keep track of for a solo practitioner with limited staff.
She also said that newer appellate attorneys who tried to save money by not spending it on software could now be forced to invest several hundred dollars on products to ensure briefs are in the proper PDF format.
Madison attorney Eric G. Barber suggested that it will be difficult for attorneys whose practices are still “completely paper-driven” to file timely documents.
“There’s going to be a point where someone cannot practice anywhere without knowing how to do things electronically,” said Barber, who practices at Perkins Coie LLP.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Clerk of Court David R. Schanker said about 40 documents were filed during the first two days and about 80 in the first week.
He said a handful of attorneys have called his office, mostly expressing “confusion” about document compatibility or registration.
Better Access
While Schanker conceded that the new rules are designed to be more “user-friendly” for judges, he noted that attorneys and the public can also freely access appellate briefs online.
“If the lawyer is registered in the system, he or she can go in and look at briefs and other documents,” Schanker said.
Attorneys who aren’t registered and the general public can access briefs through the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Access (WSCCA) Web site (http://www.wicourts.gov/) .
Schanker said that his ultimate goal is to reach a point where appeals can be initiated online.
“The courts have been behind most other areas of business in various forms of e-commerce for a long time,” he said. “I’m just delighted to have finally reached this point.”
3 Comments on This Article
| 1 |
Great news? Maybe. My guess is lazy lawyers will start stealing from other lawyer's e-briefs and briefs will become uniform vanilla pablum. The question is, when one lawyer is caught stealing by plagiarizing, what will the court do about it? It is a copyright violation to steal another's work, will it happen? You had better believe it will over and over again.
Comment By Beth Saturday, July 11, 2009 at 8:37 AM |
| 2 |
A word to the wise: don't wait until the last day to register if you are filing something. And make sure the appellate CCAP system has you listed as a counsel of record. If only your partner is, only your partner will be able to file the document electronically. Nothing you know from the federal electronic filing systems will translate to this one.
Comment By Tamara Packard Friday, July 10, 2009 at 4:52 PM |
| 3 |
When I commented on the rule, I understood that only the parties to an appeal would be able to access briefs in their own cases. However, Clerk of Supreme Court David Schanker wrote this week in the State Bar Appellate Practice newsletter:
Text Search of E-Filed Briefs. E-filed briefs will now be available to the public through the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Case Access (WSCCA) case search. In the past, users were able to view the opinions in disposed-of cases on WSCCA, but users will now be able to view briefs as they are filed. In addition, the new “Document Search” feature (on the right side of the banner at the top of the screen) allows users to enter a word or phrase and search the entire database of e-filed briefs. The search will retrieve a list of all briefs containing the word or phrase, and each brief can be viewed and searched. This is great news. Comment By Marla Stephens Friday, July 10, 2009 at 4:49 PM |
![]() |
Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines: |
![]() |
- Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
- Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
- Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
- Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
- Don't make the same point repetitively.
- No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
- Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets".










