Home Page
Click Here
LEGAL NEWS

WisTAF grants will decrease in 2009

ImageThe continued drop in interest rates and investment stocks means legal service organizations in Wisconsin will receive smaller grants in 2009 from the Wisconsin Trust Account Foundation (WisTAF).

As a result, legal service providers, such as Legal Action and Legal Aid Society, expect to cut staff positions in response to the anticipated loss of funding.

While the WisTAF board of directors have yet to formally approve 2009 grant totals, Executive Director DeEtte Tomlinson said the final number will be far less than the $1.7 million allocated though the Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA) fund this year.

“I don’t know the exact amount yet, but it’s not going to be anywhere near what the IOLTA fund generated for legal service groups in 2008,” said Tomlinson, who noted that the average interest rate earned on IOLTA accounts is approximately 0.2 percent, compared to 1.1 percent one year ago.

Deep Cuts

Legal Action of Wisconsin Inc. received $748,000 in IOLTA grant money this year, but initial estimates put the 2009 total at approximately $371,000.

John F. Ebbott, executive director of Legal Action, has already begun to compensate for the expected loss in grant money from WisTAF, along with two other federal grants.

He said about a dozen staff positions have been or will be eliminated as a result of the lost money, which could strap the organization with a $1.1 million deficit.

“Since we cannot run at a deficit we have to cut expenses,” Ebbott said. “We’ve already started on that and probably about 12 or 13 staff positions all told will have to be essentially laid off.”

Cuts are also possible at Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee which could have its IOLTA grant reduced by more than half. This year the organization received $244,000 and in 2009 it could get $105,000 or less, based on the preliminary estimate.

Executive Director Thomas R. Cannon said the average salary for a staff attorney at Legal Aid is $75,000 and the aforementioned reduction in grant money could mean the loss of at least two positions.

“The problem is that bad economic times increase the number of people who badly need our services,” Cannon said. “So our services will likely be reduced just when demand is rising dramatically.”

Tomlinson said that 19 legal service organizations applied for 2009 grant money, the same total as this year. The WisTAF board approved 16 grants for 2008, and Tomlinson said she hopes that number will remain the same next year.

But that will mean less money shared among the same number of providers.

“I think [board] members would prefer to fund everyone who we’ve gone through the preliminary grant process with,” Tomlinson said.

Board members plan to vote on final approval of 2009 grant disbursements in late November.

$50 Assessment

While IOLTA income is expected to fall, Tomlinson said the impact is eased somewhat by the consistent revenue generated by the Public Interested Legal Services Fund (PILSF).

The annual $50 assessment on Wisconsin attorneys provided more than $800,000 in grant money this year. More than $500,000 went to Legal Action and the same amount is expected in 2009.

Ebbott called the attorney assessment a “lifesaver” and also took solace in the $350,000 allotted to Legal Action as part of the $1 million state budget amendment for legal services.

“Regardless of where the [interest] rates are, those amounts remain the same,” Ebbott said.

But the $1 million may not be included in the next state budget and some organizations like Legal Aid did not receive any direct grant money from PILSF.

“I know organizations like us depend on foundations whose grants are derived from investment income and those have bleak prospects for 2009,” said Cannon, who added that Legal Aid received $155,000 from the budget provision.

Tomlinson suggested that WisTAF would not significantly shift grant money generated by PILSF to compensate for shortages created by lower IOLTA returns.

“I don’t think I could promise that would happen,” Tomlinson said. “That money comes directly from attorneys throughout the state and they trust us to make sure we disperse it fairly.”

4 Comments on This Article

1
Not to mention that public interest lawyers are saddled with the same monstrously large student debt their private practice colleagues have. There have been some better loan forgiveness programs recently, but they take years of (what is usually gruelling and thankless) public interest service before they pay off. So it's awfully tempting for a young attorney making up to 100,000 less than her fellow entry-level alumni (starting pay for legal aid attorneys is usually less than 40k) to give up public interest work for private practice.
Comment By  Misosopher
Monday, November 24, 2008 at 10:12 AM
2
$75,000 is an "average" - that for attorneys who have probably been doing this work for over 20 years is not bad. How much do you think a 20-year private practice veteran is paid? And not all legal services lawyers do get paid that much. Legal Action's salary is much lower and starts below $30,000 a year.
Comment By  Tom
Friday, November 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM
3
Does Jane understand how much the lawyers opposing public interest lawyers earn? Or does she simply believe poor people are entitled to inferior representation? Because that is what happens when the salaries offered public interest lawyers are not competitive - they leave for private practice and there is no replacement for experience.
Comment By  bradgelder@gmail.com
Friday, November 14, 2008 at 5:48 PM
4
Public Interest lawyers are making $75,000/year? That's crazy. Toss in their benefits and you're close to $100,000. It's simply unconscionable. Rather than take moderate salaries that would allow the hiring of more lawyers to help the poor, these lawyers are living high on the hog of the taxes imposed by lawyers by the Wis. Supreme Court. It's obvious that these legal aid groups put themselves first and their clients second.
Comment By  Jane
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM

Leave A Comment




Please type in the text from the above image:

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets".

ABOUT US     MANAGE MY ACCOUNT     SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT     PRIVACY POLICY     SUBSCRIBE     ADVERTISE     CONTACT US