Within the last 50, with all the "changing interpretations" of the Constitution by courts, there is no need to propose a constitutional amendment. I mean, why try and get 3/4 of the states if you can get what you want with 5 justices!
A Constitution is by definition a set of immutable principles under which society organizes itself and sets forth the basic fundamental bedrock rules by which the people agree to live. By virtue of the power of congress and states to pass laws we are able to remodel the house as society changes, but we are not suppossed to tinker with the foundation unless absolutely necessary.
The founders never intended or envisioned (although read Brutus and Cato in the antifederalist papers for some interesting predictions on the behavior of the Supreme Court) the courts usurping legislative power as they have and setting themselves up as the promulgators of national social policy.
Comment By Cato
Tuesday, April 29, 2008 at 3:19 PM









