I share the motivations behind AB576, which would make more persons eligible for representation by the State Public Defender.
In order to qualify today, a person must be poor enough to have qualified for AFDC, in 1987. Needless to say, many poor people, who cannot possibly afford representation on their own, fail to qualify under that standard. Effectively, anybody who works at all fails to qualify.
The problem is that, unless the rate paid to private attorneys who accept public defender cases is increased, too much of the burden of this change will be passed on to attorneys.
The SPD pays $40 per hour to private attorneys. If a person can’t afford an attorney, but fails to qualify under the antiquated eligibility standards, the circuit court must appoint an attorney, and the county pays the attorney, at twice that rate.
So, county taxpayers will benefit from this legislation; and state taxpayers will pick up some of that. Additional staff positions will be created within the SPD to pick up some of the additional caseload. Overall, the taxpayers of Wisconsin will benefit.
However, the reason they will benefit is because some of the caseload will pass to private attorneys, the difference being that they will only be paid $40 per hour by the state, instead of $80 per hour by the county for the same work.
I’m all for legal representation for the indigent in criminal cases. I just can’t support a proposal under which everybody benefits except the private attorneys who make the whole system work. The state must raise the rate paid to private attorneys for any proposal to be acceptable.
1 Comments on This Article
1
The working of criminal justice as an ideal, to convict the guilty and acquit the innocent, is so important in a moral society that every effort and expense that is not unreasonably expensive should be exerted in it service. Not only is the conviction of innocent people an outrage against honest government, but the fact that the culpable party is no longer sought after conviction of an innocent suspect is a danger to the public.
A far more sincere effort is in order to defeat these twin evils. Eligibilty should be presumed for anyone burdened with the hardship of hiring his own counsel and rates providing that service should be competitive in the market place for legal services.
Comment ByThomas A. Nelson Monday, December 3, 2007 at 7:11 PM
Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:
Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
Don't make the same point repetitively.
No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets".
